Skip to content

Comments

feat: optmize EncodeTimestamp#93

Closed
bdraco wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rewrite_encode_timestamp
Closed

feat: optmize EncodeTimestamp#93
bdraco wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rewrite_encode_timestamp

Conversation

@bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Mar 7, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (655f639) to head (cc552ca).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #93   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           52        52           
  Branches         5         5           
=========================================
  Hits            52        52           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #93 will not alter performance

Comparing rewrite_encode_timestamp (cc552ca) with main (655f639)

Summary

✅ 3 untouched benchmarks

@bdraco bdraco closed this Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant